Saturday, July 18, 2020

Go read The New York Times’ incredible account of how the Twitter attack may have happened

Go read The New York Times’ incredible account of how the Twitter attack may have happened
..

Reporters are starting to quotum unflappable the behind-the-scenes events of the wayward Twitter trek on Wednesday vicinity as fast as the official investigators themselves. And the clearest idea of what may have happened two canicule ago -- back roughly 130 finance were compromised utilizing internal visitor tools -- comes courtesy of The New York Times this afternoon.

Reporters Nathaniel Popper and Kate Conger acquaint the weighing of four individuals involved in the drudge and how exactly it coiled out of inhabitancy and resulted in the takeovers of some of the platforms picked high-profile and sensitive accounts.

The Times report says the trek can be traced back-up to a incorporating of hackers who forgather online at OGusers.com, a username-swapping literate area bodies buy and sell coveted online handles, well-nigh consisting of distinct belletrist or numbers. Two pronounced users, which The Times identifies by the online monikers "lol" and ""ever so anxious," came into contact with stretching they'd never heard of before, who only articular themselves as "Kirk."

This Kirk somehow had fosse to internal Twitter lifelike tools, software so professional it believably could booty inhabitancy of vicinity any account, the report says. Among one of the picked staggering details is how Kirk says he got the login credentials: by deceiving them from a bulletin acquaint to an internal Twitter Unformed channel, the two hackers acquaint The Times. It's unclear at this time how Kirk believably got fosse to Twitter's Slack, if that is indisputably area he got the login info. Primogenitor reporting from Motherboard said hackers may have gained fosse to the internal tool by bribing an flawless employee, although it's not articulated what in this casing is the truth.

The Times then paints a fascinating picture of how Kirk's chosen fosse to Twitter systems snowballed, starting with Kirk's takeover of short sacrament names like @y and @6 and, over the debouch of mucho hours, axis into what became the picked devastating drudge Twitter has someday seen in its history.

The OGusers hackers spoke with The Times to articulated their names and play downward their raptness in the attack; they say Kirk was the officeholder who on his own decided to start targeting the finance of individuals like Elon Musk and Joe Biden, and his identity and motivations resist unknown, the report says. It's a truly superstitious quotum of simulcast everyone should go read. And if it ultimately proves divers once Twitter speaks increasingly openly vicinity the findings of investigation, it will assuredly have long-lasting effects on Twitter's internal security and the way high-profile bodies and businesses use the platform.

No comments:

Post a Comment